fbpx

RPWB attorney presents genealogy of asbestos litigation

CHARLESTON, SC — RPWB asbestos attorney Karl Novak is presenting at the 2015 Plaintiff Asbestos Litigation Seminar in Las Vegas this week.

Novak has spent several months researching the genealogy of asbestos and mesothelioma litigation, including the evolution of case law and the attorneys involved in it. Fresh from piecing together his own family tree, he got the idea after seeing all of the new faces at last year’s conference.

“I remember sitting in the conference, looking around at all of the people and wondering, ‘how did we get this big and where did we come from?’” Novak said.

The presentation begins with Nellie Kershaw, a 13-year-old British woman who went to work weaving asbestos fibers. By 1922, the 29-year-old had to quit working because of respiratory problems. She died penniless four years later and was buried in an unmarked pauper’s grave after her previously employer refused to provide any assistance. Her case became the basis of the first medical article about the dangers of asbestos in 1924.

In the United States, asbestos litigation started with the first worker’s compensation claim in 1927. Much of the credit for modern-day litigation goes to Texas attorney Ward Stephenson, a third-generation attorney who took the first case against asbestos manufacturers to trial through verdict (a previous trial had settled). He lost the case in 1969.

The following month, a second asbestos victim, Claude Borel, walked into Stephenson’s office. He filed another third-party lawsuit, this time using the 1965 landmark 402A Restatement of Torts, which allows plaintiffs to hold manufacturers responsible for the strict liability of their products even if no negligence is involved. Stephenson won the case in 1971. It was appealed the following year to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stephenson died three days before the court upheld the verdict.

From that point, asbestos litigation grew dramatically. Precipitated by changes to the rules allowing lawyers to advertise, the number of defendants targeted by asbestos litigation grew from a handful to 200 in 1981. By 2002, that number had ballooned to 8,400 defendants. Similarly, the number of cases has experienced explosive growth, from about 25,000 cases by 1983 to more than 320,000 by 2005.

Novak’s love of genealogy has some striking similarities to investigating and litigating asbestos and mesothelioma cases.

“Litigating an asbestos case is not unlike researching a family tree,” he said. “We basically compile an oral history. You talk to people and you accumulate evidence. You then spread out all of the bits of information you’ve collected and put the pieces together to form a jigsaw puzzle that tells the person’s story.”

RPWB attorneys have been litigating asbestos and mesothelioma cases for more than 30 years. One of our founding members, Terry Richardson, was at the forefront of asbestos litigation in the 1970s. Since then, we have helped thousands of individuals throughout the United States. To view more information about our asbestos and mesothelioma practice, please visit www.mesoinfocenter.com

For more about Karl Novak, click here.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Settlement would compensate workers at shuttered plant

    CHARLESTON, SC – Former employees of American LaFrance, a defunct Moncks Corner fire truck manufacturer, will receive compensation for owed salary and benefits stemming from the plant’s sudden shutdown in January 2014 under the terms of a proposed settlement between the parties.

    Workers arrived at the plant on January 17, 2014 to learn that the company would cease operations immediately and that they would receive no severance packages. Plaintiffs Olivia and James Schreiner filed a class action on behalf of the workers alleging the company’s actions put it in violation of the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, which requires workers to be paid and receive benefits for 60 days when companies of a certain size reduce their workforce.

    The proposed settlement agreement, which must be approved by U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel, calls for American LaFrance and Patriarch Partners, which plaintiffs contend controlled American LaFrance, to provide lump sum payments totaling $385,000 to approximately 100 former workers at the Moncks Corner plant.

    “This settlement will essentially give workers a six week severance package,” said lead counsel James L. Ward, Jr. of Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, which represents the workers. “Given the precarious financial position of American LaFrance, which ceases to exist or hold meaningful assets, and the inherent risks associated with a protracted legal battle, this settlement compensates the employees, helping them as they transition to the next chapter of their lives.”

    Prior to its shuttering, American LaFrance employed about 500 workers at locations in California, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina, about 100 of whom were based at the company’s Moncks Corner facility. Workers at the company’s other locations did not quality for compensation because the employer’s headcount at those facilities did not meet federal thresholds.

    All eligible former employees will receive written notice of the proposed settlement agreement and additional notifications throughout the settlement approval process. A hearing date on the motion for preliminary approval of the proposed settlement has not been scheduled.

    RPWB is a plaintiff law firm based in Charleston, SC with extensive experience in complex litigation across a diverse array of practice areas, including employment class action cases. Patriarch Partners LLC, is a private equity investment  firm based in New York that invests in financially-distressed companies.

    Case Information

    Schreiner et al v. Patriarch Partners LLC et al

    Case #: 2:2014cv00220

    Plaintiff Attorneys: James L. Ward, Jr., T. Christopher Tuck and Catherine H. McElveen of Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman in Mt. Pleasant, SC; and Randall Charpia of Charpia Law Firm in Summerville, SC.

    Defense Attorneys:  Paul I. Perlman, Peter C. Godfrey, and Robert J. Fluskey of Hodgson Russ LLP in Buffalo, NY; and Scott Schools and E. Brandon Gaskins of Moore & Van Allen PLLC in Charleston, SC.

    Judge: The Hon. Richard M. Gergel of the District of South Carolina

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

      Contact Us

      Case Types

      Related Posts

      Charles Patrick voted ‘Lawyer of the Year’

      CHARLESTON, SC – RPWB attorney Charles W. Patrick, Jr. has been named a “Lawyer of the Year” for the Charleston market in the 2016 edition of The Best Lawyers of America©.

      The designation, this time for plaintiff product liability litigation, marks the fourth time Patrick has been named as lawyer of the year. He was selected for mass tort litigation in 2011, 2012 and 2014.

      Patrick is a founding member of Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, a national plaintiff law firm with offices in South Carolina and Illinois. The firm represents people in complex litigation across a diverse array of practice areas, including both mass torts and individual actions, throughout the United States.

      In all, seven RPWB attorneys are named to the Best Lawyers® list for their respective practice areas:

      Terry Richardson
      Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs
      Railroad Law

      Charles Patrick
      Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs
      Products Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

      Ed Westbrook
      Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs

      Michael Brickman
      Securities Litigation

      Hoyt Rowell
      Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs
      Health Care Law

      Blair Hahn
      Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

      Jay Ward
      Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Plaintiffs
      Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

      About RPWB

      The firm is currently lead counsel in multi-district litigation against Pfizer for allegedly failing to disclose the side effects of Lipitor, co-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Delta and AirTran for allegedly colluding to implement baggage fees, and is assisting six Canadian provinces as foreign legal consultants in litigation to recoup public health spending on tobacco-related illness.

      Additionally, RPWB is heavily involved in securities, mutual fund and insurance litigation, pursuing matters associated with many of the major financial controversies of the day, including high-speed trading, excessive compensation at mutual funds, market manipulation by traders at big banks and improper insurance risk calculations.

      While RPWB takes pride in our work to help large groups of people who have been wronged by some of the biggest companies in the world, we are equally proud of our efforts to help individual clients seek justice. The firm represents individual plaintiffs in many practice areas, including: catastrophic personal injury, truck accidents, railroad accidents, construction defects, medical malpractice, mesothelioma and other occupational lung disease.

      Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation. More than 6.7 million votes by eligible attorneys were analyzed for the 2016 edition. Lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed.

      Our Experienced Lawyers

      How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

        Contact Us

        Case Types

        Related Posts

        RPWB class action leads to nationwide bus recall

        CHARLESTON, SC – An Indiana bus maker has settled two class action lawsuits brought by a Charleston law firm that will result in a recall of more than 8,000 shuttle buses to ensure that the vehicles comply with federal safety standards.

        Starcraft Bus manufactured the buses between 2002 and 2007, but failed to weigh the vehicles with a full tank of fuel prior to labeling them with the maximum amount of cargo they can handle. Federal law requires manufacturers to factor in a full tank of fuel when calculating a vehicle’s weight and certifying the buses for sale. In a typical bus, a full tank of fuel can weigh hundreds of pounds.

        This certification failure resulted in buses being heavier than is legally permitted and included erroneous cargo capacity specifications that could lead to vehicle overloading. The company corrected the practice in late 2007, but must now take steps to recertify and modify, as needed, all buses manufactured prior to the 2007 change.

        The lead plaintiff in the South Carolina case, the Church of Christ of Azalea Drive, located in Charleston, identified the weight problem when parishioners noticed the label on their bus indicated it could carry no cargo, despite the fact it was equipped with luggage racks.

        Lawyers for the church at Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, along with its co-counsel, had the bus weighed and determined it was well in excess of the gross vehicle weight rating. Although Starcraft Bus responded with a recall of 399 buses, subsequent investigation determined that the problem affected a broader range of 8,129 vehicles due to the uniform flaw in the way the company calculated vehicle weight.

        “These shuttle buses are routinely used by churches, senior centers and businesses,” said T. Christopher Tuck, lead counsel for RPWB, which brought the suit. “When a vehicle has not been weighed properly, it can have dire consequences, including cumulative stresses to braking, steering and vehicle stability that jeopardize the safety of vehicle occupants and others who are sharing the road with the buses.”

        As part of the settlement, Starcraft Bus and its parent, Forest River, will make any modifications to buses needed to comply with federal weight restrictions. The company also will reimburse vehicle owners $1,500 for each seat that must be removed to bring the vehicle within the gross vehicle weight rating. The buses will then be recertified and properly labeled. Owners of affected vehicles will receive automatic notification of the recall.

        “This litigation is somewhat unusual in that it triggered two recalls,” Tuck said. “Recalls are generally initiated by the federal government or voluntarily by the manufacturer. We are pleased the company has now admitted responsibility for the problem and is actively working to correct it.”

        The nationwide settlement was approved on March 31, 2015 by U.S. District Judge Patrick M. Duffy.

        RPWB is a plaintiff law firm based in Charleston, SC with extensive experience in complex litigation across a diverse array of practice areas, including vehicle defect cases. Starcraft Bus is a division of Forest River in Elkhart, IN. Forest River is owned by Berkshire Hathaway.

        Case Information
        The Church of Christ at Azalea Drive vs. Forest River, Inc. et al.
        Case #: 2:11cv3371-PMD
        Plaintiff Attorneys: T. Christopher Tuck, James L. Ward, Jr., Robert S. Wood, and A. Hoyt Rowell, III of Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman in Mt. Pleasant, SC; Mark C. Tanenbaum of Mark C. Tanenbaum Law Office in Charleston, SC; John L. Davidson of Davidson Bowie Sanders in Flowood, MS; and William H. Garvin of the Garvin Law Firm in Tallahassee, FL.

        Our Experienced Lawyers

        How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

          Contact Us

          Case Types

          Related Posts

          RPWB had two of SC’s largest settlements last year

          Charleston, SC – Two of the top 8 verdicts and settlements in South Carolina last year were cases litigated by Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, according to South Carolina Lawyers Weekly.

          The weekly newspaper tailored for the legal community compiles the results throughout the year and released the top 25 largest case outcomes in its Feb. 2 edition.

          RPWB is pleased to bring compensation and justice to all of the people we help each year throughout the country, including the residents of St. Croix and coastal South Carolina in the following cases:

          2. SC attorneys negotiate $125M settlement for Virgin Islands
          Two Mt. Pleasant attorneys helped negotiate settlements, estimated to total between $125 million and $145 million, on behalf of the U.S. Virgin Islands to compensate for contamination caused by refineries on the southern coast of St. Croix.

          Jerry Evans and Gordon Rhea of Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman represented the Virgin Islands, along with a local attorney there, against two refineries, one for oil and the other for alumina.

          The oil refinery allowed millions of gallons of petroleum to seep into groundwater through leaking underground pipes and storage tanks. A toxic waste product known as red mud and other corrosive byproducts contaminated the ground surface at the alumina refinery and seeped into the soils and groundwater.

          Some of the most significant damage was done to a large aquifer, an underground water source and an important resource for an island surrounded by salt water.

          Both refineries are now closed.

          ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE
          Case name: Commissioner Department of Planning & Natural Res. v. Century Alumina Company
          Court: U.S. District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands
          Case number: 1:05-cv-00062-HB
          Judge: Harvey Bartle
          Amount: $67.25 million in cash plus environmental remediation and restoration work estimated to cost $58 million to $76 million
          Settlement date: In stages, with the final settlement reached May 28
          Mediator: Edward Cahn, retired U.S. District Court judge
          Attorneys for the plaintiffs: Jerry Evans and Gordon Rhea of Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, Mt. Pleasant; and John Dema, Christiansted, St. Croix.

          8. Horry Electric settles mold suit for $6M, tries to recoup from Santee Cooper
          In a class-action suit, coastal homeowners settled for $6 million after discovering mold growing in their shrink-wrapped homes. The shrink-wrap was intended to make their homes energy efficient but instead created ideal conditions for fostering fungi.

          After settling with homeowners, Horry Electric Cooperative filed suit against Santee Cooper, accusing it of misleading the cooperative more than 30 years ago about liability issues associated with the Good Cents Program, which gave owners of energy efficient homes a monthly credit on their utility bills.

          One of the specifications required the home to have a plastic vapor barrier between its exterior and interior walls. An attorney who represented more than 1,000 homeowners said he uncovered letters from a Santee Cooper employee written in the mid-1980s expressing concern regarding wrapping homes in the warm, humid environment.

          Homeowners only recently began discovering the mold growing in their walls, a situation that often required invasive measures such as tearing out cabinetry and drywall to correct.

          The case against Santee Cooper was dismissed without prejudice by a Horry County Circuit Court judge, but it is unclear whether Horry Electric will file suit again. Horry’s attorney, Pope Johnson III, did not immediately return an email seeking comment.

          NEGLIGENCE – BUILDING DEFECTS
          Case name: Ferrell, et al. v. Horry Electric Cooperative
          Court: Horry County Court of Common Pleas
          Date of settlement: May 27
          Amount: $6 million
          Attorneys for plaintiffs: Nate Fata (Surfside Beach) and Chris Tuck and Jay Ward of Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman (Mount Pleasant)
          Attorney for defendant: Pope Johnson (Columbia)

          Our Experienced Lawyers

          How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

            Contact Us

            Case Types

            Related Posts

            RPWB is pleased to announce a new member

            Thomas joined the firm in 2010 as an associate. He focuses on business litigation, class action lawsuits, medical devices, personal injury, products and premises liability, truck accidents and vehicle defects.

            In 2012, he was named one of the top 40 trial lawyers under 40-years-old by National Trial Lawyers, an invitation-only association that recognizes top talent in the legal profession. In 2014, Super Lawyers – a national legal ranking service – recognized Thomas as a rising star in South Carolina.

            Thomas is a 2004 graduate of the University of South Carolina School of Law and holds an undergraduate degree in political science from Florida State University.

            Prior to joining RPWB, he was a partner with Lewis & Babcock in Columbia.

            Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman represents plaintiffs in complex litigation throughout the United States. The firm has 31 attorneys who work in Barnwell, Charleston, Mt. Pleasant and Edwardsville, Ill.

            In addition to general litigation and catastrophic personal injury work, the firm has extensive experience with cases pertaining to asbestos, antitrust, class action lawsuits, predatory lending, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, medical malpractice, healthcare fraud, securities fraud, toxic torts and vehicle defects.

            For more about Thomas, click here

            Our Experienced Lawyers

            How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

              Contact Us

              Case Types

              Related Posts

              Graniteville train derailment: 10 years later

              In the early morning hours of January 6, 2005, two Norfolk Southern trains collided in Graniteville, South Carolina, setting off a chain of events that would lead to the deaths of nine people and injuries to at least 250 others.

              A tanker car ruptured, spewing about 60 tons of chlorine gas into the air. Approximately 5,400 residents living within a mile of the wreck were evacuated from their homes.

              RPWB members David Butler and Terry Richardson represented Avondale Mills, the company located right next to the collision site, in its pursuit for compensation against Norfolk Southern for damages to buildings and equipment. The two parties entered into a confidential settlement in 2008 in what media outlets have described as being the largest single tort settlement in South Carolina history. Additionally, RPWB represented plaintiffs who were killed or injured as a result of the train derailment and chlorine gas exposure.

              The Aiken Standard offers this retrospective of the legal fight to compensate victims following the tragedy.

              Our Experienced Lawyers

              How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

                Contact Us

                Case Types

                Related Posts

                RPWB SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT DECISION

                RPWB attorneys Terry Richardson and Chris Moore along with Robert McKenzie of McDonald, McKenzie, Rubin, Miller and Lybrand in Columbia, South Carolina successfully argued for the invalidation of a family member step-down provision contained in the automobile insurance policy which insured their clients who were tragically killed in a railroad crossing incident. The family member step-down provision at issue operated to reduce the amount of liability coverage provided by the policy to the minimum limits in South Carolina when the injured person was a named insured or a household relative of the insured – those persons known to use the insured vehicle the most.

                Chris Moore argued the case before the Supreme Court of South Carolina in March 2013 and the Court’s opinion was published August 20, 2014. The Court found that the family member step-down provision violated the public policy of South Carolina in that it conflicted with a state statute and that enforcement of such a provision would be injurious to the public welfare of South Carolina. The opinion can be read in its entirety here: http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/opinions/HTMLFiles/SC/27435.pdf 

                Our Experienced Lawyers

                How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

                  Contact Us

                  Case Types

                  Related Posts

                  RPWB WELCOMES NEW ATTORNEY – MATTHEW A. NICKLES

                  Richardson, Patrick, Westbrook & Brickman, LLC (RPWB), announced it has hired Matthew A. Nickles as an associate attorney. He will practice in the areas of Antitrust, Class Actions and Securities Fraud.

                  Mr. Nickles earned a B.A. in History from Washington and Lee University where he graduated magna cum laude. He received his J.D., cum laude, from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 2010 where he was a member of the Order of the Coif, Order of the Wig and Robe and Articles Editor for the South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business. Also, Mr. Nickles was Associate Justice of Writing and Research, Moot Court; a Merit Scholarship Recipient and CALI Awards winner. Most recently, he was a law clerk for the Honorable Richard M. Gergel, U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

                  Mr. Nickles will practice in the firm’s Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina office.

                  Our Experienced Lawyers

                  How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

                    Contact Us

                    Case Types

                    Related Posts

                    Hess v. Volkswagen

                    The district court granted final approval on November 21, 2012. The approval order was appealed by an objector.  The appeal has been dismissed and the settlement has now become final.  Rust Consulting will now begin processing the payment of valid claims and mailing checks to qualifying class members.  These payments were mailed in 2013.

                    The district court has denied any additional requests for claims payments.

                    Our Experienced Lawyers

                    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

                      Contact Us

                      Case Types

                      Related Posts