fbpx

School, a place for learning and asbestos exposure?

South Carolina parents send their children to school with the expectation that they will receive a good education in a safe environment. But what if schools are not as safe as they are supposed to be? Children could be unwitting victims of asbestos exposure, which can lead to serious and even fatal health problems in the future.

Right now, groups of out-of-state parents are dealing with this exact scenario. In the middle of Sept. 2019, an environmental expert discovered damaged asbestos in one of the schools in his or her area. Despite the well-known dangers of asbestos, the school system did not have the problem examined until a news agency started to investigate the matter in late Oct. 2019.

This is not the first time that this particular school district has dealt with asbestos problems. Construction at one of its high schools resulted in contamination that likely exposed many of its 1,000 students to asbestos. One parent in the district reported that he kept his children home from school following these ongoing problems, citing concerns that they could possibly develop cancer in a decade or two.

Asbestos can often be found all over older school buildings in South Carolina, and may even show up in things like ceiling and floor tiles in schools that were built more recently. Any asbestos exposure can cause innocent children who are simply trying to get an education to develop devastating illnesses like mesothelioma. When this happens, it might be up to parents to take serious action against negligent school districts.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    Conflicting findings regarding asbestos exposure from baby powder

    When a South Carolina parent buys a product for his or her child, there is the assumption that the product will be safe to use and not cause any harm, injury or illness. Over the last few weeks, reports about the possibility of asbestos exposure due to Johnson & Johnson baby powder products has caused major concern for consumers. In response, there was a major recall of this product.

    Initial testing of the one bottle of the product has found that there was evidence of trace amounts of asbestos in the powder. However, Johnson & Johnson says that the newest tests reveal there is none to be found in the recalled product. This can be confusing for those who simply want to know if the product is safe or if their child could be facing the possibility of illness because of a product marketed to parents.

    The company says it has done multiple tests through at least two outside companies, and the recalled product had nothing harmful in it. Currently, the company is also dealing with litigation over baby talcum powder. Plaintiffs claim that the product contained asbestos, eventually leading to the development of certain types of cancer. While there have been several substantial verdicts against the company, many have been overturned or are currently being appealed.

    Asbestos exposure from consumer products is likely grounds for legal action. If a South Carolina person believes that he or she is the victim of this type of harmful exposure, that individual will find it beneficial to take quick action to learn about the legal options available. It may be possible to bring a civil claim against the manufacturer or join ongoing litigation.

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

      Contact Us

      Case Types

      Related Posts

      Johnson & Johnson issues recall over asbestos exposure

      Johnson & Johnson has been in the media for quite some time, but the coverage has not been good. Patients with mesothelioma have repeatedly blamed their asbestos exposure on the company’s talc baby powder. Although Johnson & Johnson has repeatedly denied these allegations, it recently recalled tens of thousands of baby powder products that tested positive for asbestos. South Carolina residents may want to be cautious of using Johnson’s Baby Powder at this time.

      Since 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been taking a closer look at cosmetic products. Approximately 50 products have been tested as part of this survey, including two different samples of Johnson’s Baby Powder. One of those samples came back positive for asbestos, and the company issued a voluntary recall of all the baby powder products that came from that specific lot.

      This is not the first time that asbestos has shown up in Johnson’s Baby Powder. A report from Reuters showed that Johnson & Johnson knew that its baby powder contained asbestos for decades, but never disclosed that information. The company disagrees with the report and insists that it has test results from over 40 years that show its product is safe. The most recent discovery of asbestos in its baby powder my cast doubt on that claim.

      The FDA said that there are currently no reports of adverse experiences related to the recently recalled lot of baby powder. However, it is unlikely that reports of this nature would appear any time soon. Asbestos exposure can — and quite often does — lead to mesothelioma, but this cancer takes years or even decades to develop. It is possible that some South Carolina consumers might have already been exposed and are on a path toward a difficult future. Maintaining careful documentation of exposure and medical information may be helpful, and an experienced attorney can probably provide valuable guidance to those want additional support.

      Our Experienced Lawyers

      How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

        Contact Us

        Case Types

        Related Posts

        Study links asbestos exposure from talc to mesothelioma

        Asbestos is extremely dangerous, and yet it can be found lurking in any number of products and places in South Carolina. Even products that are not supposed to contain any asbestos at all can be contaminated with the toxic substance, like talc-based products such as baby powder. A recently published study affirmed the link between asbestos exposure through contaminated talcum powder contaminated and the deadly cancer mesothelioma.

        The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine published the case studies that looked at 33 patients suffering from mesothelioma, most of whom were women. Researchers confirmed that these patients’ primary source of exposure came from using talcum powder, commonly referred to as baby powder. At least six of the patients participated in tissue testing. The results showed that they all had asbestos fibers like the ones found in cosmetic talc in their body tissue, and not like the fibers associated with insulation or building supplies.

        The cosmetic industry is not very well regulated. Because of this, asbestos continues to show up in products where it should not be, such as facial talc-based facial makeup. Companies also have the ability to test their own products to ensure that no asbestos is present. This does not always mean that a company will make other moves to protect consumers if it finds asbestos in its products. Johnson & Johnson knew that its baby powder product was contaminated with asbestos decades before that information came to light.

        Having a study that affirms the link between asbestos-contaminated talc products and mesothelioma may make it easier for victims who choose to pursue compensation. Still, it can be difficult for asbestos exposure victims in South Carolina to demonstrate when or where the exposures took place, especially since they may have been years or even decades in the past. Those who are worried about this part of the process may prefer to speak with an experienced attorney before starting the process for compensation.

        Our Experienced Lawyers

        How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

          Contact Us

          Case Types

          Related Posts

          Asbestos exposure — who is most at risk?

          Unless working in certain industries, chances are that most people in South Carolina do not give much thought to encountering asbestos during their daily lives. However, asbestos exposure is much more common than one might think. Regular, low-level exposure can happen to anyone.

          Virtually everyone ends up being exposed to asbestos. As unfortunate as it is, there are often low levels of this toxic substance in water, soil and air. Millions of people in America have suffered asbestos exposure since as far back as the 1940s. Research has shown that there is no such thing as a safe amount of asbestos for humans. Investigators have discovered many cases of asbestos-related illnesses in people who suffered only brief exposure.

          Still, those who are exposed to asbestos most frequently and in larger amounts are generally more likely to develop related diseases such as mesothelioma. This exposure is usually the result of working in industries that use asbestos, such as car mechanics who frequently work with brakes. Firefighters in South Carolina are also at risk for asbestos exposure when they enter burning buildings that contain asbestos. Evidence has even shown that family members can also face heavy asbestos exposure when workers return home with asbestos fibers on their clothing, shoes, skin and hair.

          No one is truly safe from asbestos. Symptoms of diseases related to asbestos exposure usually do not surface until 10 to 40 years down the line. If a person chooses to pursue compensation for his or her pain and suffering, emotional trauma and financial damages, it can be difficult to demonstrate who was responsible for the exposure that led to the illness. Documenting instances of known exposure can be helpful, but speaking with an experienced attorney may also be useful.

          Our Experienced Lawyers

          How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

            Contact Us

            Case Types

            Related Posts

            What does South Carolina state law say about asbestos exposure?

            Before anyone was aware of the health hazards, asbestos was a highly valued substance used in a variety of industries. Although it is now banned for most new uses, there is no escaping the centuries of use that can still be found in office buildings, homes and even vehicles. South Carolina has laws that are intended to minimize the risk of asbestos exposure when dealing with or removing this toxic substance.

            South Carolina’s Department of Health and Environmental Control requires all workers involved with asbestos abatement to receive necessary training and be licensed. Having well-trained workers can minimize the risk of exposure to both themselves, innocent bystanders and the community at large. Facilities that are slated for demolition or renovation also have to undergo inspections for asbestos before any work can begin.

            Like with almost all rules, there are a few exceptions within state law. Both residential housing that has four or fewer units and individual homes are exempt from the inspection process for renovations and demolition. However, individuals who are planning this type of work are still strongly advised to take safety precautions to prevent inadvertent exposure. It is especially important to follow the proper protocols for disposal to prevent introducing asbestos into the surrounding environment.

            It is not easy to determine exactly where asbestos might be hiding, so South Carolina’s laws are intended to protect residents from harm. Unfortunately, many people still suffer from asbestos exposure. Those who develop mesothelioma, lung cancer or asbestosis may be able to pursue compensation against individuals and entities who were negligent in their handling and disposal of asbestos.

            Our Experienced Lawyers

            How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

              Contact Us

              Case Types

              Related Posts

              Makeup company puts consumers at risk of asbestos exposure

              It is no secret that asbestos is a dangerous and deadly substance. Unfortunately, South Carolina consumers might be more susceptible to asbestos exposure than they may think. Asbestos continues to show up in products where it should not, putting individual consumers at risk for developing deadly diseases.

              A safety alert from the Food and Drug Administration urges consumers to immediately stop using cosmetics by the company Beauty Plus. The FDA says that it found asbestos in four or more products, including a beauty palette, matte blush, shimmer bronzer and bronzer, all of which are talc-based. Beauty Plus has issued a voluntary recall, the second of which it has had to make.

              Makeup and other products that use talc might be more likely to contain hidden asbestos than other types of products. Both asbestos and talc form and can be found within the same type of rock. This close connection with asbestos means that most of the world’s talc deposits have asbestos contamination. When that talc is then used in products such as makeup, consumers might not be aware of the risks they are taking when making purchases. One government representative recently introduced new legislation that would require asbestos warning labels on all makeup products created for children, but this does little for adults who may also be at risk.

              In general, consumers in South Carolina like to be as informed as possible when it comes to products. Unfortunately, getting clear information on products that might put them at risk for asbestos exposure can be difficult if not impossible. Because of this, victims who develop serious diseases like mesothelioma may choose to pursue legal action against companies that did not warn consumers about the possibility of asbestos contamination.

              Our Experienced Lawyers

              How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

                Contact Us

                Case Types

                Related Posts

                Victim of asbestos exposure awarded $8.4 million for damages

                In South Carolina, asbestos is far from a problem of the past. People who attend school in old buildings or work in industries that still use asbestos can easily come into contact with the substance. Asbestos exposure at any level can be dangerous, and health problems may develop many years later.

                A man who developed pleural mesothelioma after decades working in the auto industry claimed that he was routinely exposed to asbestos during his career. He worked at multiple car dealerships for Lincoln, Mercury and Ford from the 1960s through the 1980s. He says the sources of the exposure were things like gaskets, clutches, brakes and replacement parts for OEM.

                After his diagnosis, he filed a lawsuit for his asbestos-related injuries, which went to trial in early Aug. 2019. The trial lasted less than two weeks, and he was awarded $8.433 million for his injuries and damages. Since he is still undergoing treatment for his fatal cancer, he was unable to appear in court when the verdict was read, although a loved one stood in on his behalf.

                Compensation for victims of asbestos exposure is extremely important. Medical bills for mesothelioma treatment can quickly pile up, and many victims either have to leave work or are already living on fixed, limited incomes. This is on top of the emotional damage physical pain and suffering of living with a fatal disease. Pursuing a civil suit against South Carolina employers, manufacturers and other responsible parties is often the most effective solution for victims to pursue the compensation they need.

                Our Experienced Lawyers

                How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

                  Contact Us

                  Case Types

                  Related Posts

                  Workers say asbestos exposure put them at risk

                  South Carolina workers should be able to trust their employers to provide safe working environments. When dangers arise in a workplace, an employer should alert his or her staff to the problem. In some situations — such as that of asbestos exposure — removing workers from an area is the most appropriate course of action. Not all employers treat this situation as seriously as they should.

                  Workers in another state recently spoke up about a serious problem at their place of work. Construction crews were in the middle of a project to install new flooring in a building when they allegedly discovered that the old flooring was contaminated with asbestos. The company responsible for the installation projected placed a piece of carpet over the asbestos-tainted floor and contacted the local Department of Management Services. The DMS says that workers were never in any danger.

                  The employees who were working in the building at the time say that the DMS account of things is not accurate. They claim that no one performed any air tests until months after the initial asbestos discovery was made. It is also possible that those in charge of the product were aware of the dangerous nature of the flooring project. While the project kicked off during the fall in 2018, DMS had already brought up asbestos-specific renovation starting on July 5 of the same year.

                  An employer, building owner or other authorized figure in South Carolina must take thorough precautions when performing a renovation or construction project on a building that contains asbestos. Any type of careless action can disturb the asbestos, releasing it into the air where it can then be inhaled. This type of negligent asbestos exposure can have perilous health outcomes. An individual who knows that he or she has been exposed to this toxic substance may want to collect as much information as possible on the matter, as it may be useful should it be necessary to pursue compensation in the future.

                  Our Experienced Lawyers

                  How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

                    Contact Us

                    Case Types

                    Related Posts

                    Popcorn ceilings hidden source of asbestos exposure

                    Asbestos is far from being a problem of the past. This dangerous substance can still be found in a number of older products that still exist today, and new uses in specific industries may make it difficult for people in South Carolina to avoid asbestos exposure throughout the course of their lives. For example, depending on the age of a person’s home, asbestos could be hiding in plain sight.

                    The once-popular popcorn ceilings may have gone out of fashion a couple of decades ago, but many homes and apartments still sport these ceiling styles. Popcorn ceilings were especially popular between the 1950s and 1980s. This type of ceiling is noted for its ease of application, ability to hide imperfections and acoustic benefits. Asbestos was a primary ingredient in the popcorn ceiling, and a 1977 ban on the ingredient in the spray-on paint did not necessarily stop its use. Manufacturers were given permission to continue using this asbestos product until they ran out of existing stock.

                    When contained within a product or material, asbestos does not pose much threat. However, when things like popcorn ceilings or floor tiles are disturbed, asbestos fibers can become airborne. Once inhaled, people can develop serious and even fatal diseases. Popcorn ceilings might not have posed much of a threat when first applied, but aging homes with older and less sturdy components could be a different story.

                    If a person suffered from asbestos exposure because of another person’s negligent upkeep, it is possible to pursue compensation for any resulting injuries. Diseases such as lung cancer and mesothelioma usually involve steep medical bills that can be difficult or even impossible to pay off. By holding negligent parties in South Carolina responsible for their actions, victims may be able to better focus on their health and future well-being.

                    Our Experienced Lawyers

                    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

                      Contact Us

                      Case Types

                      Related Posts