fbpx

Johnson & Johnson Talc Bankruptcy Petition Dismissal is a Win for Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Victims

mesothelioma attorney Dave Butler

By Dave Butler

In a significant victory for injured consumers, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the bankruptcy petition of a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary that holds the company’s liabilities for claims brought by thousands of consumers injured by exposure to asbestos-contaminated talc in Johnson & Johnson products.  The dismissal, on January 30, 2023, ends for now J&J’s efforts to avoid full responsibility for the claims of those suffering from mesothelioma, ovarian, and other cancers caused by its asbestos-contaminated products.

Through a series of corporate transactions under a unique Texas law, Johnson & Johnson created two new entities with the intention to funnel its liabilities for claims brought by thousands of injured talc claimants into a new entity which it named LTL Management; while simultaneously funneling all of its profitable business into another entity.  Two days after its formation and freshly saddled with J&J’s talc liabilities, LTL Management filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code claiming that its talc liabilities placed it in financial distress sufficient to allow it to seek the protections afforded by U.S. bankruptcy laws.

Injured talc victims sought dismissal of the bankruptcy petition, but were denied by a federal court in New Jersey.  Victims appealed that denial to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that the J&J subsidiary had not demonstrated that its petition was filed in good faith and should be dismissed.

In its opinion the court found that “At base level, LTL, whose employees are all J&J employees, is essentially a shell company “formed,” almost exclusively, “to manage and defend thousands of talc-related claims” while insulating at least the assets in a non-bankrupt entity.  The court went on to find that “Because LTL was not in financial distress, it cannot show its petition served a valid bankruptcy purpose and was filed in good faith under” the United States Bankruptcy Code.  In conclusion, the court held that:

Our decision dismisses the bankruptcy filing of a company created to file for bankruptcy. It restricts J&J’s ability to move thousands of claims out of trial courts and into bankruptcy court so they may be resolved, in J&J’s words, “equitably” and “efficiently.” But given Chapter 11’s ability to redefine fundamental rights of third parties, only those facing financial distress can call on bankruptcy’s tools to do so. Applied here, while LTL faces substantial future talc liability, its funding backstop plainly mitigates any financial distress foreseen on its petition date.

Read the court’s full opinion here.

RPWB continues to seek justice for victims of exposure to Johnson & Johnson talc products. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma after exposure to Johnson & Johnson talc products, please call us at u 1-866-594-8765 or fill out the form on this page to begin your case review.

Dave Butler has 30 years of experience representing mesothelioma victims and their families in cases throughout the United States. He can be reached at 1-866-594-8765 or by emailing dbutler@rpwb.com.

Our Experienced Lawyers

How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

    Contact Us

    Case Types

    Related Posts

    FDA pushes for more testing amid asbestos exposure concern

    Current asbestos testing standards for industries that use talc are fairly loose. As recent reports have shown that many products contain this toxic substance, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is pushing for new testing standards. If implemented, it could possibly lower the risk of asbestos exposure for people in South Carolina and across the country.

    The FDA allowed the cosmetics talc industry to basically self-police when it comes to asbestos and testing. The last time the FDA held a hearing focusing on asbestos and testing methods in cosmetics was in 1971, meaning the industry has been handling these issues on its own for several decades. The FDA did not test any cosmetic products from then until 2018, when it discovered that many popular cosmetic products were contaminated with asbestos.

    In addition to stronger standards for testing talc, the FDA wants to take things one step further. Minerals that resemble asbestos are also frequently found in talc, but there are currently no testing requirements for those minerals. Experts agree that look-alike minerals quite often cause very similar health problems which are nearly indistinguishable from those related to asbestos.

    Both the FDA and the World Health Organization agree that there is no safe level for asbestos exposure. People can easily inhale tiny particles that then make their way to the lungs. Mesothelioma and ovarian cancer have both been linked to asbestos, and thousands of people — some in South Carolina — have already filed lawsuits against companies that sold tainted products. Many of these individuals are seeking compensation for things like medical care, loss of income and even physical and emotional trauma.

    Our Experienced Lawyers

    How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

      Contact Us

      Case Types

      Related Posts

      Construction workers learn of asbestos exposure months later

      There is a very good reason that asbestos abatement is tightly regulated in South Carolina. When mishandled, asbestos fibers are released into the air. Those airborne fibers are easily inhaled. For those who do not quite understand just how serious this is, it is important to know that asbestos exposure can lead to a number of different cancers, including the incurable cancer mesothelioma.

      Asbestos was recently discovered at a construction site where a building had been demolished earlier in 2019. Construction workers were apparently not instructed to take any safety precautions for asbestos at the time of demolition. However, workers later discovered what they thought was likely asbestos inside another building at the same site.

      Following that discovery, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control — the SCDHEC — tested rubble from the demolished building. The results confirmed what the workers had already suspected. There had been asbestos in the building they had already demolished. Perhaps even more upsetting than realizing that they and the surrounding communities had been exposed to asbestos is just how long it took the SCDHEC to take action. The debris from the building had been left on-site for months.

      Many victims in South Carolina do not even realize they were exposed to asbestos until they develop a related disease. For those who do learn of their asbestos exposure beforehand, it is important to maintain detailed records of the event as well as medical histories. This type of information is often useful when a person develops mesothelioma or other cancer and chooses to pursue compensation for his or her damages. It might even be helpful to speak with an experienced attorney about what information is most important to document.

      Our Experienced Lawyers

      How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

        Contact Us

        Case Types

        Related Posts

        Renovations caused asbestos exposure for residents, workers

        Having a safe place to live is important for the health and safety of all South Carolina residents. No one really wants to face ongoing health threats at home. Unseen dangers can be anywhere, though. For some people, a particularly troublesome unseen danger is asbestos exposure, which can cause life-threatening illnesses.

        The Occupational Safety and Health Administration recently cited a property management company for seriously mishandling asbestos during apartment renovations. According to OSHA, asbestos was frequently disturbed and released into the air at this out-of-state apartment complex. However, these violations are all related to employee safety and improper containment, as the men and women working at the complex were not told about the presence of asbestos or given any protective gear. The citations do not refer to the apartment residents, who were also unknowingly exposed.

        Residents were not told that they would have to leave during renovations, even when work went on in their units. According to one former resident, workers entered her apartment and performed work on all of her windows but did not clean anything up afterward. She apparently had to clean up all of the material that had been ripped out or discarded, most of which likely contained asbestos. All residents have since been evacuated from the property.

        There has to be a certain level of trust between tenants and landlords. Renters have to trust that the properties they live in are safe, but landlords sometimes break that trust in favor of minimizing their own costs. There can be serious consequences when this blatant disregard for safety results in asbestos exposure. If renters in South Carolina discover that they have been wrongfully exposed to asbestos, it is a good idea to maintain careful records of known exposures as well as related medical information. An experienced attorney might be able to provide further advice on which information to keep track of.

        Our Experienced Lawyers

        How can we help? Fill out the form for a free case review.

          Contact Us

          Case Types

          Related Posts

          You have probably been affected by asbestos exposure

          There are many valid concerns about being exposed to the toxic substance known as asbestos. Since asbestos exposure is known to cause mesothelioma and other fatal diseases, most people want to avoid it at all costs. However, many people in South Carolina have been exposed to asbestos on at least one occasion.

          Limited exposure to asbestos usually is not a cause for concern. Only a small percentage of people who encounter asbestos only once or twice will become sick as a result. Any risk of mesothelioma or other related diseases is a cause for concern.

          Long-term exposure is more likely to cause illness. For example, men and women who have served or are currently serving in the United States military are at a higher risk for asbestos exposure than the average South Carolina resident. Exposure risk also varies within the military, as veterans who are involved with construction, automotive repair and similar activities are more likely to encounter asbestos.

          Even if a person does not work in an industry that uses asbestos, live in an older building or regularly visit places likely to have asbestos, he or she could still encounter asbestos. Living with someone who was exposed to asbestos makes it much more likely that roommates and family members will be indirectly exposed. Asbestos fibers easily travel on workers’ clothes, hair and skin.

          Developing mesothelioma may feel very unfair to people who have done their best to avoid asbestos exposure. While this can be a normal reaction, victims may still be able to recover compensation for their pain, emotional trauma and financial damages. Even if exposure only occurred once or twice, a victim can pursue a legal claim against the entity that was the source of that exposure.

          Our Experienced Lawyers